Released 15 December 2020.
US military Joint and Army civil affairs doctrine have failed to consider the operational relevance of gender, posing a risk to mission accomplishment and force protection. A comparison of NATO and Australian Defence Force doctrine reveals gender considerations have been included in Allied doctrine in recent years. US land-force operational planning can provide an example of how a focus on civil affairs doctrine could jump-start the process to address the larger doctrinal gender deficit quickly and effectively. Click here for the article.
Podcast (decisive-point): Play in new window | Download (Duration: 8:43 — 12.0MB)
Subscribe to this podcast on Apple Podcasts | RSS | More
