View the Executi" /> Re-examining the Roles of Landpower in the 21st Century and Their Implications

Text Browser Navigation Bar: Main Site Navigation and Search | Current Page Navigation | Current Page Content

U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Re-examining the Roles of Landpower in the 21st Century and Their Implications

Login to "My SSI" Contact

U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

Re-examining the Roles of Landpower in the 21st Century and Their Implications

Authored by Dr. William T. Johnsen.

Re-examining the Roles of Land... Cover Image

Brief Synopsis

View the Executive Summary

After 13 years of prolonged ground combat, a weary American public is leery of further interventions requiring land forces. Shifting geostrategic conditions, such as a revanchist Russia and a rising China, reinforce this reluctance. At the same time, technological innovation once more offers the chimera of war from a distance that does not endanger land forces. Nonetheless, at some point, a highly volatile international security environment will place U.S. national interests at risk, requiring the use of military power. Given the increasing rise of interdependence among all components of military power (air, cyberspace, land, sea, and space), a better understanding of Landpower is essential if national leaders are to have a full range of policy options for protecting and promoting those interests. Landpower, “the ability—by threat, force, or occupation—to gain, sustain, exploit control over land, resources, and people,” stems from a country’s geostrategic conditions, economic power, population, form of government, and national will. The military elements of Landpower include a country’s ground forces, the institutions that generate and sustain those forces, and the human dimension—intelligent, highly adaptable, and innovative individuals—so vital to the successful employment of Landpower. Landpower offers policymakers tremendous utility in peace, crisis, or war, because Landpower can defeat, deter, compel, reassure, engage, and support the nation. Within each of these roles, as well as across them, Landpower can carry out the broadest range of military operations. This versatility across the spectrum of conflict offers national leaders the greatest number of effective policy options.

You may also be interested in the following titles:

Survey: Re-examining the Roles of Landpower in the 21st Century and Their Implications

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality? (5 best - 1 Worst)

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

Also by the Author/Editor:

European Security: Washington's Shaping Strategy in Action
Redefining Land Power for the 21st Century
Force Planning Considerations for Army XXI
The Future Roles of U.S. Military Power and Their Implications
U.S. Participation in IFOR: A Marathon, not a Sprint
The Future of American Landpower: Strategic Challenges for the 21st Century Army
Deciphering the Balkan Enigma: Using History to Inform Policy
U.S. Policy in the Balkans: A Hobson's Choice

View other pubs in the following categories:

Landpower Employment & Sustainment
Military Strategy and Policy
National Security Strategy

  • Download it Now!

  • Hardcopies

    • Study is: Available
    • Add to Cart
    • For out of stock or digital only publications, refer to the new GPO on-demand site. For a small fee, receive many prior publications. Click here to visit.
    • All materials on our website are available as a free download.