Text Browser Navigation Bar: Main Site Navigation and Search | Current Page Navigation | Current Page Content

U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> U.S. Participation in IFOR: A Marathon, not a Sprint

Login to "My SSI" Contact

U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

U.S. Participation in IFOR: A Marathon, not a Sprint

Authored by Dr. William T. Johnsen.

U.S. Participation in IFOR: A ... Cover Image

Other Studies by Keyword

+[Balkans] +[Bosnia] +[SFOR] +[IFOR] +[Yugoslavia] +[NATO] +[Johnsen]

Brief Synopsis

The U.S. decision to join the Implementation Force (IFOR) for the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Hercegovina (familiarly known as the Dayton Accords) marked a crucial milestone toward achieving the U.S. national objective of a lasting political settlement to the conflict in Bosnia. Equally critical will be determining whether the United States will continue participating in IFOR beyond the currently established 12-month deadline. Decisions of great import rarely entail simple cause and effect judgments. Thinking through the likely second and third order consequences of contemplated actions often defines success or failure as much as dealing with the issue of the moment. Such is the case for U.S. policy in Bosnia. In examining what form U.S. involvement in IFOR beyond the current deadline will take, we should recall that, while events inside Bosnia influenced the introduction of U.S. ground troops, wider U.S. interests in the Balkans, in Europe, and throughout the world proved more pivotal in the decision-making calculus. Likewise, a decision on whether to withdraw from or to extend IFOR also must encompass a similarly broad geo-strategic context. To that end, Dr. William Johnsen examines in this monograph the potential for creating suitable conditions for a lasting political settlement in Bosnia by December 1996, identifies possible outcomes of a U.S. withdrawal from IFOR, and assesses potential consequences for U.S. national objectives and interests within the Balkans, and beyond. Dr. Johnsen's conclusions will not sit well with most in the United States and abroad who are weary of the Bosnian "problem" and would like to see it "wrapped up" by December. That it appears intractable on the civil side despite IFOR's quieting of the guns heightens the frustration.

You may also be interested in the following titles:

Survey: U.S. Participation in IFOR: A Marathon, not a Sprint

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality? (5 best - 1 Worst)

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

Also by the Author/Editor:

Re-examining the Roles of Landpower in the 21st Century and Their Implications
European Security: Washington's Shaping Strategy in Action
Redefining Land Power for the 21st Century
Force Planning Considerations for Army XXI
The Future Roles of U.S. Military Power and Their Implications
The Future of American Landpower: Strategic Challenges for the 21st Century Army
Deciphering the Balkan Enigma: Using History to Inform Policy
U.S. Policy in the Balkans: A Hobson's Choice

View other pubs in the following category:

Eastern Europe

  • Download it Now!

    • Download Format: PDF
    • PDF File Size: 0.11MB
  • Hardcopies

    • Study is: Available via Download Only
    • For out of stock or digital only publications, refer to the new GPO on-demand site. For a small fee, receive many prior publications. Click here to visit.
    • All materials on our website are available as a free download.