Text Browser Navigation Bar: Main Site Navigation and Search | Current Page Navigation | Current Page Content

U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Force Planning in an Era of Uncertainty: Two MRCs as a Force Sizing Framework

Login to "My SSI" Contact

U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

Force Planning in an Era of Uncertainty: Two MRCs as a Force Sizing Framework

Authored by Professor John F. Troxell.

Force Planning in an Era of Un... Cover Image

Other Studies by Keyword

+[force planning] +[threat-based planning capabilities] +[MRC] +[force posture] +[planning scenarios] +[force generation] +[Troxell]

Brief Synopsis

Colonel John F. Troxell first asserts that there is a false dichotomy being drawn between capabilities-based and threat-based force planning. He argues that post-Cold War force planning must be founded on a logical integration of threat- and capabilities-based planning methodologies. He then addresses the issue of the two Major Regional Contingency (MRC) force-sizing paradigm. After reviewing all the arguments made against that paradigm, Colonel Troxell concludes that in a world characterized by uncertainty and regional instability, in which the United States has global security interests and a unique leadership role, the two MRC framework constitutes a logical scheme for organizing U.S. defense planning efforts. That framework is also flexible enough to accommodate adjustments to the U.S. defense establishment, both today and for the immediate future. New approaches to planning scenarios and the operational concept for employing forces offer the potential for such adjustments concerning the "ways" of the strategic paradigm, while force thinning and modernization are two important categories for adjusting the affordability of the strategic "means." At some point, changes in the international security environment will demand significantly different approaches to shaping U.S. forces. But, given the QDR's ringing endorsement of the two MRC construct, that change will be a 21st, rather than a 20th, century undertaking.

You may also be interested in the following titles:

Survey: Force Planning in an Era of Uncertainty: Two MRCs as a Force Sizing Framework

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality? (5 best - 1 Worst)

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

Also by the Author/Editor:

Avoiding the Trap: U.S. Strategy and Policy for Competing in the Asia-Pacific Beyond the Rebalance
Outplayed: Regaining Strategic Initiative in the Gray Zone, A Report Sponsored by the Army Capabilities Integration Center in Coordination with Joint Staff J-39/Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment Branch

View other pubs in the following categories:

Military Leadership
Future Forces
Operational Concepts

  • Download it Now!

    • Download Format: PDF
    • PDF File Size: 0.22MB
  • Hardcopies

    • Study is: Available via Download Only
    • For out of stock or digital only publications, refer to the new GPO on-demand site. For a small fee, receive many prior publications. Click here to visit.
    • All materials on our website are available as a free download.