Text Browser Navigation Bar: Main Site Navigation and Search | Current Page Navigation | Current Page Content

U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Fourth-Generation War and Other Myths

Login to "My SSI" Contact

U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

Fourth-Generation War and Other Myths

Authored by Dr. Antulio J. Echevarria II.

Fourth-Generation War and Othe... Cover Image

Other Studies by Keyword

+[Echevarria] +[Terrorism] +[Insurgency] +[Super insurgency] +[Hammes] +[Iraq] +[insurgency] +[Globalization] +[Peace of Westphalia] +[Blitzkrieg] +[Nontrinitarian war] +[Clausewitz] +[Mao] +[People’s war]

Brief Synopsis

Fourth Generation War (4GW) emerged in the late 1980s, but has become popular due to recent twists in the war in Iraq, and terrorist attacks worldwide. In brief, the theory holds that warfare has evolved through four generations: 1) the use of massed manpower, 2) firepower, 3) maneuver, and now 4) an evolved form of insurgency that employs all available networks—political, economic, social, military—to convince an opponent's decision makers that their strategic goals are either unachievable or too costly. Further, the theory contends that this last form characterizes the terrorists' way of fighting today. Despite reinventing itself several times, the theory has several fundamental flaws that need to be exposed before it influences U.S. operational and strategic thinking. A critique of 4GW is both timely and important because examining the theory's assumptions exposes significant faults in other popular notions, such as the idea of nontrinitarian war, that might exert damaging influence over U.S. strategy and military doctrine. What we are really seeing in the war on terror and the campaign in Iraq and elsewhere is that the increased "dispersion and democratization of technology, information, and finance" brought about by globalization has given terrorist groups greater mobility and access worldwide. At this point, globalization seems to aid the nonstate actor more than the state, but states still play a central role in the support or defeat of terrorist groups or insurgencies. We would do well to abandon the theory of 4GW altogether, since it sheds very little, if any, light on this phenomenon.

You may also be interested in the following titles:

Survey: Fourth-Generation War and Other Myths

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality? (5 best - 1 Worst)

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

Also by the Author/Editor:

Operating in the Gray Zone: An Alternative Paradigm for U.S. Military Strategy
2012-13 Key Strategic Issues List
Preparing for One War and Getting Another?
Strategic Implications of Emerging Technologies
Key Strategic Issues List, July 2008
Wars of Ideas and the War of Ideas
Challenging Transformation's Clichés
2006 Key Strategic Issues List (KSIL)

View other pubs in the following category:

21st Century Warfare

  • Download it Now!

    • Download Format: PDF
    • PDF File Size: 0.82MB
  • Hardcopies

    • Study is: Available via Download Only
    • For out of stock or digital only publications, refer to the new GPO on-demand site. For a small fee, receive many prior publications. Click here to visit.
    • All materials on our website are available as a free download.