Text Browser Navigation Bar: Main Site Navigation and Search | Current Page Navigation | Current Page Content

U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Faculty Directory and Bio Sketches >> Brigadier General (Ret.) Huba Wass de Czege

Login to "My SSI" Contact

Brigadier General (Ret.) Huba Wass de Czege

External Researcher

Brigadier General Huba Wass de Czege, U.S. Army Ret., is a veteran of ground combat in Vietnam, and has commanded at all Army levels through brigade. He was a lead participant in the development of AirLand Battle Doctrine during the 1980s, founder and first director of the U.S. Army School of Advanced Military Studies at Fort Leavenworth, KS. Later, he was a special strategic policy assistant to the NATO Supreme Army Commander Europe (SACREUR) and Secretary General at the end of the Cold War. He retired as the Assistant Division Commander (Maneuver) of the Big Red One at Fort Riley, KS, in 1993. After retirement, Brigadier General Wass de Czege served as a consultant on future warfighting concepts to the U.S. Army, the Joint Staff, National Reconnaissance Office, and to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency until 2010. Until 2009, he was a frequent “mentor”at Army and other service Title 10 wargames exploring the future of warfare. Brigadier General Wass de Czege has shared his insights broadly in military journals, including Armed Forces Journal, Military Review, Army Magazine, Small War Journal, and others. Currently, he is researching and writing a book about Strategy, Operational Art, and Tactics in the 21st Century.

*The above information may not be current. It was current at the time when the individual worked for SSI or was published by SSI.

SSI books and monographs by Brigadier General (Ret.) Huba Wass de Czege

  • Toward a Strategy of Positive Ends

    September 01, 2001

    Authored by Dr. Antulio J. Echevarria, II, Brigadier General (Ret.) Huba Wass de Czege.
    Brigadier General (Retired) Huba Wass de Czege and Lieutenant Colonel Antulio J. Echevarria II make a case for a strategy aimed at achieving positive, rather than neutral or negative, ends. They first discuss the dynamic conditions of the new strategic environment, then explore the options the United States has available for dealing with those conditions. The options include (1) preventive defense, (2) neo-isolationism, and (3) a strategy that pursues positive ends.

SSI articles, editorial, and briefs by Brigadier General (Ret.) Huba Wass de Czege