Skip to main content (Press Enter).
Toggle navigation
US Army War College - Strategic Studies Institute
US Army War College - Strategic Studies Institute
Search Army War College - SSI:
Search
Search
Search Army War College - SSI:
Search
Home
Who We Are
Faculty and Staff
Contact Us
Opportunities
Visiting Professors
Events
List of Events
CLSC
About CLSC
CLSC Dialogues
PLA Conferences
Research
Insights
External Articles
CLSC Newsletter
CLSC Quick Takes
Regional Issues
European Security
South & Latin America
Research & Commentary
Annual Estimate
SSI Worldwide
INDOPACOM
Study of Internal Conflict
SOIC Study Methodology
SOIC Conflict Studies
Integrated Research Project Topics (IRPs)
Archived Content
Remembering 9/11, 20 Years Later
Special Commentary COVID-19
SRAD Newsletter
SSI Media
Podcasts
Decisive Point Podcast
Conversations on Strategy
CLSC Dialogues
SSI Live Podcast
Lectures and Panels
Recent Publications
USAWC Press
Parameters
Parameters Bookshelf
Articles & Editorials
Decisive Point Podcast
Conversations on Strategy Podcast
Publications Site
Publishing Guide
Press Tips
CLSC Dialogues
Home
:
SSI Media
:
Recent Publications
Results:
Tag:
Antulio J. Echevarria II
The 2026 National Defense Strategy
March 17, 2026
— Military strategists Dr. Frank G. Hoffman (retired) and Dr. Antulio J. Echevarria II analyze the 2026 National Defense Strategy...
MORE
Ukraine’s Not-So-Whole-of-Society at War: Force Generation in Modern Developed Societies
March 11, 2026
— This podcast argues that Ukraine offers a cautionary tale regarding the two main modern models of force generation. Neither the professional high-tech war model, favored by Western militaries, nor the whole-of-society war approach, said to have saved Ukraine in 2014 and 2022, proved successful formulas for Ukraine. Considering that Ukraine is fighting for survival, with Russian forces inside the country, the failure of both models in action has serious implications for NATO member states as they deliberate their choices regarding future force generation...
MORE
Strategic Rivalries: How Are They Won?
March 6, 2026
— This article argues strategic rivalries—distinct from general strategic competition—are best understood as contests in which states prioritize weakening a specific opponent’s capacity to compete. It departs from existing work by critiquing the Joint Concept for Competing’s narrow definition and by emphasizing rivalry termination as a central but understudied dimension. Drawing on decades of international relations scholarship and historical datasets of interstate rivalries since 1815, the article analyzes how rivalries end and identifies strategic preclusion as a proactive approach for winning them. Its insights offer policy and military practitioners guidance for shaping competitive strategies short of war...
MORE
Parameters | Spring 2026
March 6, 2026
— Welcome to the Spring 2026 issue of Parameters, which consists of an In Focus special commentary, three forums (Clausewitz and Modern Warfare, Operational Considerations, and Historical Studies), and the Strategic Competition Corner...
MORE
Parameters | Winter 2025–26
December 17, 2025
— Welcome to the Winter 2025–26 issue of Parameters, which consists of an In Focus special commentary, two forums (Indo-Pacific Deterrence and Considerations for Modern Warfare), and the new Strategic Competition Corner...
MORE
Reframing the Nature of Strategic Competition
December 17, 2025
— In this Corner, Dr. Antulio J. Echevarria II, professor of strategic competition at the US Army War College, critiques the essential concepts underpinning US doctrine concerning intrastate strategic competition. In this, his inaugural contribution, Dr. Echevarria discusses the shortfalls in the Joint concept of interstate strategic competition, namely, its failure to capture the true nature of that competition. A more extensive reading of the scholarly literature on strategic rivalry suggests the nature of strategic competition should be reframed to align more closely with the nature of war...
MORE