Skip to main content (Press Enter).
Toggle navigation
US Army War College - Strategic Studies Institute
US Army War College - Strategic Studies Institute
Search Army War College - SSI:
Search
Search
Search Army War College - SSI:
Search
Home
Who We Are
Faculty and Staff
Contact Us
Opportunities
Visiting Professors
Events
List of Events
CLSC
About CLSC
CLSC Dialogues
PLA Conferences
Research
Insights
External Articles
CLSC Newsletter
CLSC Quick Takes
Regional Issues
European Security
South & Latin America
Research & Commentary
Annual Estimate
SSI Worldwide
INDOPACOM
Study of Internal Conflict
SOIC Study Methodology
SOIC Conflict Studies
Integrated Research Project Topics (IRPs)
Archived Content
Remembering 9/11, 20 Years Later
Special Commentary COVID-19
SRAD Newsletter
Strategic Competition Center
SSI Media
Podcasts
Decisive Point Podcast
Conversations on Strategy
CLSC Dialogues
SSI Live Podcast
Lectures and Panels
Recent Publications
USAWC Press
Parameters
Parameters Bookshelf
Articles & Editorials
Decisive Point Podcast
Conversations on Strategy Podcast
Publications Site
Publishing Guide
Press Tips
Home
:
SSI Media
:
Recent Publications
Results:
Tag:
strategic rivalry
What is Strategic Rivalry? Why Should We Care?
April 9, 2026
— The states most likely to draw America into its next major crisis or war are not unknowns. They are the usual suspects: The same handful of states that have threatened the United States repeatedly across decades. Interstate rivals have caused roughly 80 percent of history’s wars and the odds of any given rivalry ending peacefully are little better than a coin toss. Yet America’s key strategy documents since the 2017 National Security Strategy have used phrases like great power competition, interstate strategic competition, and strategic competition without acknowledging the essential difference between a competition and a rivalry...
MORE
Strategic Rivalries: How Are They Won?
March 6, 2026
— This article argues strategic rivalries—distinct from general strategic competition—are best understood as contests in which states prioritize weakening a specific opponent’s capacity to compete. It departs from existing work by critiquing the Joint Concept for Competing’s narrow definition and by emphasizing rivalry termination as a central but understudied dimension. Drawing on decades of international relations scholarship and historical datasets of interstate rivalries since 1815, the article analyzes how rivalries end and identifies strategic preclusion as a proactive approach for winning them. Its insights offer policy and military practitioners guidance for shaping competitive strategies short of war...
MORE